It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media. do you agree that it is the main reason for a growth in the rate of juvenile crime? What solutions can be offer to deal with this situation.
Many people believe that social media is the main reason of causing the trend of juvenile delinquency. While I totally agree with this view, the family also has to take the responsibility for this problem. The following essay would attempt to outline some viable solutions.
To start with, it is undeniable that the internet’s contents have a big influence on teenagers. For instance, brutal images in movies and games can trigger children’s imitation. As a result, they always try to copy the character’s violent actions and desire to be professional in the cinematography. Moreover, family sides also contribute to this negative trend. Once parents ignore their children and are unable to meet their basic demands, children will grow up in an unfulfilled condition. This can be made worse when the children are surrounded by mates with improper behaviors. With peer influences, there is no doubt that they will follow their friends's bad examples. Consequently, they easily take part in illegal activities such as stealing or becoming drugs addict.
To tackle this problems, certain steps can be taken. Firstly, the government should control contents that appear on social media or television. All unsuitable videos need to be labeled parental advisory and require advance confirmation whether the watchers are of enough age or not. Secondly, parents play an important role, they should monitor both time-consuming as well as subjects on the internet. Less neglecting and more supporting are certainly necessary during the teenage period. Hence, parents can understand their kids and build a connection with them.
In conclusion, by limiting violent movies and providing guidance during childhood, juvenile crime will no longer exist in the future.
- The charts below show the percentage of time younger and older people spend on various Internet activities in their free time excluding email Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 67
- The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002 67
- average monthly spend on children s sports in Britain 84
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 775, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch as stealing or becoming drugs addict. To tackle this problems, certain steps c...
^^^
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...g or becoming drugs addict. To tackle this problems, certain steps can be taken. F...
^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...they should monitor both time-consuming as well as subjects on the internet. Less neglecti...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42700729927 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89728846725 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667883211679 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7881977243 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.4705882353 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1176470588 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9411764706 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220865485402 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598100148366 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524872072779 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123062466465 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276053122111 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.