It is the responsibility of schools to teach children good behavior in addition to provide formal education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is undeniable that assigning responsibility to schools or families for the development of children is always the top priority of each nation. There is an opinion that apart from providing students with academic knowledge, education institutes should be accountable for forming children’s good behavior. In my point of view, I mostly agree with this statement, although parents should also play a crucial role to help offspring improve their interpersonal skills.
To begin with, it is believed that schools are effective environments for children to be trained to become well-behaved individuals. To be more specific, by instilling positive values such as honesty, respect, kindness, and responsibility through lessons, teachers serve as good models for children and help them foster empathy and understanding toward others. For instance, as moral lessons about being polite and respectful are delivered, pupils can acknowledge the importance of these codes of demeanor and tend to exhibit them in real life, creating a more harmonious community.
Furthermore, since students spend a significant portion of their time in school, the school environment can profoundly impact not only their academic performance but also their social skills. More specifically, by attending schools, which are considered representative of society, students can learn how to handle conflicts, solve problems and communicate effectively. These skills are extremely essential in their future life, both personal and professional. To illustrate, teachers can divide the class into small groups and request them to solve homework together. This assignment can create an opportunity for children to sharpen their teamwork skills and learn how to cherish their difference and value contradicting opinions which are important skills in the working environment.
However, the responsibility of teaching good demeanor cannot solely be the school’s onus since parents also play a vital role in forming a child’s conduct. In other words, it seems more difficult to teach children good behavior if they live with parents who always use abusive language or derogatory terms to other people. Therefore, to create a rounded- development in personality for children, it is parents that must be good models for them at first.
In conclusion, while a formal education is essential, it is equally crucial for schools to share the responsibility with parents in ensuring that students are well-prepared to be good citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-14 | hoaithuongnguyen | 84 | view |
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 89
- Some people think that cities are the best places to live in Others prefer to live in a rural area Compare the advantages and disadvantages of living in the city to living in the countryside 73
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 89
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work What could be the reasons for this Do you think it is a positive or a negative development 61
- Consumers are facing an increasing number of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63395225464 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1116783118 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575596816976 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2351316495 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.6 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1333333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189595999047 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676411490819 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581651543665 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123278661007 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05851249306 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63395225464 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1116783118 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575596816976 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2351316495 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.6 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1333333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189595999047 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676411490819 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581651543665 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123278661007 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05851249306 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.