It s very important that children should study hard at school Time spent studying on the Internet is time wasted Do you agree or disagree State the reasons for your answer

Nowadays, many adults believe that it is extremely important for children to study hard at school, whereas time spent studying on the Internet is time wasted. In my experience, studying with the help of the Internet is better than just studying hard at school.

To begin with, students can self-study effectively on the Internet if they have time management and self-discipline, which can help them not be addicted to harmful webs and programs on computers. The Internet provides an endless wealth of information, then children can search for online courses and tutorials or even anything they want in a quick and efficient way. Moreover, they can study at their own pace. Sometimes lessons taught at school are too fast for children to understand, so using the Internet can help them learn about that once more time, which helps them better understand complex concepts. In short, self-study will build up children's studying experience.
Furthermore, students can reach out to professionals in their chosen fields. That helps them enhance their knowledge about the problems they are facing. Besides, various websites and study apps are designed with the aim not only to support students' study but also to relax. As a result, children can study without stress, find studying more attractive and make them study much better. In addition, when students have any difficulties in studying, they can post their matters on studying websites, thus their friends or the Internet will deal with the problems for them. That not only widens their knowledge about them but also build up children's relationship online.

In conclusion, although studying hard at school is necessary for adolescents, I strongly agree that time spent studying on the Internet is as essential as studying at school, and should not be considered as wasted time activity.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, thus, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, in short, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22297297297 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72215969345 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537162162162 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9653683002 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.428571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392951674873 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159852915486 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15234049978 0.0667982634062 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.333895443983 0.151304729494 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162497520381 0.056905535591 286% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.