It s very important that children should study hard at school Time spent studying on the Internet is time wasted Do you agree or disagree State the reasons for your answer

Nowadays, many adults believe that it is extremely important for children to study hard at school, whereas time spent studying on the Internet is time wasted. In my experience, studying with the help of the Internet is better than just studying hard at school.

To begin with, students can self-study effectively on the Internet if they have time management and self-discipline, which can help them not be addicted to harmful webs and programs on computers. The Internet provides an endless wealth of information, then children can search for online courses and tutorials or even anything they want in a quick and efficient way. Moreover, they can study at their own pace. Sometimes lessons taught at school are too fast for children to understand, so using the Internet can help they learn about that once more time, which helps them better understand complex concepts. In short, self-study will build up children's studying experience. Furthermore, students can reach out to professionals in their chosen fields. That helps them enhance their knowledge about the problems they are facing. Besides, various websites, study apps are designed with the aim not only to support students study but also to relax. As a result, children can study without stress, find studying more attractive and make them study much better. In addition, when students have any difficulties in studying, they can post their matters on studying websites, thus their friends or the Internet will deal with the problems for them. That not only widens their knowledge about them but also build up children's relationship online.

In conclusion, although studying hard at school is necessary for adolescents, I strongly agree that time spent studying on the Internet is not time wasted.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, thus, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, in short, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2332155477 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70982577655 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540636042403 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6454778342 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.785714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363604837757 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156842865743 0.084324248473 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144882523993 0.0667982634062 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.382561806948 0.151304729494 253% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12395191974 0.056905535591 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.