It is said that the fast pace of our everyday life, as a direct result of the rapid development of telecommunications technology and travel industry, has negative effects on individuals, nations and globe. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In these days, the influence of the hasty pace of modern life resulting from the proliferation of telecommunications technology and travel industry has sparked considerable public debate. Although its drawbacks seem plausible, from my personal perspective, the merits of this trend are more significant.
Advocates of the opinion that the fast pace of life may exert negative influence on human life can seek support from a large number of arguments. First, since the hasty-paced lifestyle can boost human work productivity, it is responsible for the outbreak of life-style-related problems. For example, jobs now are more demanding and require workers’ full commitment, which triggers them to come under high pressure of work and suffer from depression. Second, fax, email, smart phone or other modern means of communication enable employees to exchange information with manager, colleagues and customers at any time, that means they are actually working longer, even outside their working hours and have a less sense of relaxation.
Although the fast-paced lifestyle has some deficits, it is not to say that it has no redeeming feature. In fact, thanks to the advancements of technology such as telecommunication or transport, people can make inquire via smartphone, email, or social networks such as Facebook, Viber without making any physical travels and leaving their office, which reduces the time spent on commutes, makes way for other tasks and boosts work productivity. Moreover, the acceleration of the pace of everyday life also has a function to expand people’s social circle. Nowadays ones can harness social networks and digital devices to keep in touch with the others, as well as take advantage of the modern travel industry to travel further to get acquainted with more people, expose to the new culture and cultivate knowledge, regardless of geographical distance.
In conclusion, while the fast pace of life does have some demerits, I believe that these are negligible compared to the merits. Despite causing some problems related to lifestyle and some intrusions, there are a myriad of benefits people can reap from this acceleration, provided that they do not overuse and rely on it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-18 | thaohienpt008 | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | vantran2297 | 95 | view |
| 2018-07-12 | ntphuc0101 | 96 | view |
- Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many employees may work at home with modern technology Some people claim that it benefits only worker but not employers Do you agree or disagree 81
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- The technology development has affected social relationships from person to person Do the negative aspects of this trend outweigh the positive aspects 50
- A few major languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nce on human life can seek support from a large number of arguments. First, since the hasty-paced...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 213, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...estyle and some intrusions, there are a myriad of benefits people can reap from this a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43515850144 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09191416886 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608069164265 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.2920240722 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.166666667 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9166666667 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1441468751 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586371147182 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514049867353 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883390470205 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021033980858 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.