It is said that the fast pace of our everyday life, as a direct result of the rapid development of telecommunications technology and travel industry, has negative effects on individuals, nations and the globe. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people argue that the fast progression of technology communications and travel industry have many adverse drawbacks for people and nations. Personally, I hold the firm that the advantages coming from both fields are more significant than that of disadvantages.
First of all, technology and the internet are considered a groundbreaking invention that bridges a global gap allowing people to connect, work and study with many people from all around the world. Thanks to the internet, they can easily access enormous knowledge that helps them save valuable time and resources and complete many tasks efficiently and accurately. For example, people still worked and studied effectively by using the internet during the period of lockdown by the dangerous diseases like covid19. Secondly, the express means transport that improves the living standards and contributes to the development of a nation’s economy and tourism. People easily come and travel from place to place by quick transports like air, super express that makes their life more convenient so they are interested in traveling that helps increase tourism revenue of the country.
On the other hand, many people believe that overuse of technology has a negative impact on the people and nations in general. First, technology creates a virtual gap between people because they are being “wired” with their phones and do not spend time with their family or friends. This phenomenon not only makes a wall between them but also affects the development of behavior of children like losing social interactions and empathy. Secondly, in recent years, malicious parties take advantage of super express or airplanes that deliver drugs and illegal goods from all over the world that strongly affects our life and increases social evils in a nation.
In conclusion, although overusing technology and the booming of transports have some defects on people and nations, I believe that both fields play a crucial part in the progression of people's society and need a larger national budget to develop it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-18 | thaohienpt008 | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | vantran2297 | 95 | view |
| 2018-07-12 | ntphuc0101 | 96 | view |
- It is said that the fast pace of our everyday life as a direct result of the rapid development of telecommunications technology and travel industry has negative effects on individuals nations and the globe To what extent do you agree or disagree 55
- Studies suggested that nowadays children watch more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons And what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creative 61
- Some people believe that culture will be ruined if it is used to earn tourism revenue but others consider that tourism is the only way of protecting a culture Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- An increasing number of people are choosing to have cosmetic surgery in order to improve their appearance Why do people have operations to change the way they look Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in general, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3527607362 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72960118821 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.5181920133 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.416666667 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119404216768 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454840055283 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307220884312 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764762698796 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168389329657 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in general, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3527607362 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72960118821 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.5181920133 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.416666667 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119404216768 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454840055283 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307220884312 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764762698796 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168389329657 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.