It is said that raising the cost of air tickets would reduce the number of people traveling by planes because of damaging issues for the environment. While I partly agree with this tendency, I strongly believe that other measures would be more effective.
On the one hand, increasing air tickets is considered as a solution to address the problems related to the environment. When the cost of air travel is cheap, more people can afford to fly. The growth in popularity of economic airlines proves that cheap air travel would encourage flying. For example, in the UK, after 1996, numerous people booked holiday packets to holiday resorts to get away from it all is increasing because budget airlines offered attractive and affordable prices. Therefore, there is definitely a link between the cost of plane tickets and citizens traveling by plane.
On the other hand, I would contend that other approaches such as introducing renewable energy to the airplane would be more productive. The first reason is that increasing airline tickets just affects the minority of people with low incomes. Individuals living in affluence will travel by plane owing to its fast speed and inconvenience. Secondly, it is obvious that developing cleaner fuels would be more feasible and effective in relation to sustainable development. This would cut down the carbon emissions of aircraft and make a significant contribution to reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.
In conclusion, although raising the price of air travel is an effective policy to adopt to discourage people from flying, it would be environmentally better to concentrate on developing clearer non-polluting fuels for aircraft.
It is said that raising the cost of air tickets would reduce the number of people traveling by planes because of damaging issues for the environment. While I partly agree with this tendency, I strongly believe that other measures would be more effective.
On the one hand, increasing air tickets is considered as a solution to address the problems related to the environment. When the cost of air travel is cheap, more people can afford to fly. The growth in popularity of economic airlines proves that cheap air travel would encourage flying. For example, in the UK, after 1996, numerous people booked holiday packets to holiday resorts to get away from it all is increasing because budget airlines offered attractive and affordable prices. Therefore, there is definitely a link between the cost of plane tickets and citizens traveling by plane.
On the other hand, I would contend that other approaches such as introducing renewable energy to the airplane would be more productive. The first reason is that increasing airline tickets just affects the minority of people with low incomes. Individuals living in affluence will travel by plane owing to its fast speed and inconvenience. Secondly, it is obvious that developing cleaner fuels would be more feasible and effective in relation to sustainable development. This would cut down the carbon emissions of aircraft and make a significant contribution to reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.
In conclusion, although raising the price of air travel is an effective policy to adopt to discourage people from flying, it would be environmentally better to concentrate on developing clearer non-polluting fuels for aircraft.
- It is believed that pleasure reading is a better way to improve imagination and linguistic skills than watching TV I agree with this idea for some reasons Of course reading for pleasure brings benefits to the readers As a language teacher I have seen stud 61
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by four types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 67
- The table illustrates the number of international tourists in the leading eight nations in two years 2009 and 2010 and the change It is evident that France was visited the most among other countries in both years While tourist arrivals in Germany increase 78
- It is justified that government money should be spent on arts Others believe that governments should focus on health care and education Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- It is true that people who have a reference for reading rather than watching TV usually have more lively imaginations and sharped language skill While many people oppose to this idea I strongly agree with this view On the one hand I advocate that reading 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther measures would be more effective. On the one hand, increasing air tickets ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ckets and citizens traveling by plane. On the other hand, I would contend that ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reducing our reliance on fossil fuels. In conclusion, although raising the pric...
^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...of air travel is an effective policy to adopt to discourage people from flying, it would...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29104477612 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90505623848 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5195113469 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.076923077 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.56240469214 0.244688304435 230% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183214699794 0.084324248473 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153078668456 0.0667982634062 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.377732077011 0.151304729494 250% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.263218407647 0.056905535591 463% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther measures would be more effective. On the one hand, increasing air tickets ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ckets and citizens traveling by plane. On the other hand, I would contend that ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reducing our reliance on fossil fuels. In conclusion, although raising the pric...
^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...of air travel is an effective policy to adopt to discourage people from flying, it would...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29104477612 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90505623848 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5195113469 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.076923077 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.56240469214 0.244688304435 230% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183214699794 0.084324248473 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153078668456 0.0667982634062 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.377732077011 0.151304729494 250% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.263218407647 0.056905535591 463% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.