The Leisure activity is growing rapidly .The active role of modern technology in people's
leisure lives nowadays has made them less creative. Do you agree or disagree.
It is unequivocal fact that technology has exerted huge impacts on individuals ' leisure lives. while some minority group refute the favourable aspects, I subscribe to the optimistic perception. I will highlight the points which support the viewpoints in looming paragraphs.
First and foremost, people are becoming more creative by applying technology in a leisure industry like cinema. The famous movie named 'Avatar' is designed by software graphics. Technology played a vital role in this movie. Moreover, children are getting familiar with graphic design as they have started to create cartoons and video games through coding.
Most of the children are joining sports like cricket, badminton, chess and the last one is famous
among youngsters to sharpen the mind.
Furthermore, in the medieval period, youngsters spent their spare time by playing sports. But now they are thinking differently and always try to do better than others whether it is in study or school competitions. In terms of old people, they utilised their time by setting in groups or playing cards and cracking jokes. currently, they prefer to spend their time with family by exploring adorable destinations. Advancement in technology ameliorates the living standard of human beings. Masses are engaging in online occupations rather than sitting idle.
I would like to reiterate that this is a false perception that technology is responsible for the less creative mind. However, technology alters the way of living.
- Some people think that telling the truth is not always essential It is necessary to tell lies sometimes To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the UK economy in the twentieth century Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and the comparisons whe 73
- The table below gives information about the percentage of adults who paid for admission to various entertainment events in five nations 83
- The table shows the reason for studying the English language for the people of Japan The information is based on a survey that was conducted in the year 2000 63
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... has exerted huge impacts on individuals leisure lives while some minority group ...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... among youngsters to sharpen the mind Furthermore in the medieval period young...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...mong youngsters to sharpen the mind Furthermore in the medieval period youngsters spent...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 232.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34482758621 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70881767979 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650862068966 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 232.0 20.2975951904 1143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1240.0 106.682146367 1162% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 232.0 20.7667163134 1117% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 57.0 7.06120827912 807% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152504318606 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152504318606 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649107029752 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535694730955 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 119.7 13.0946893788 914% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -172.46 50.2224549098 -343% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 95.0 11.3001002004 841% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.17 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 20.25 8.58950901804 236% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 9.78957915832 603% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 94.8 10.1190380762 937% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 95.0 10.7795591182 881% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... has exerted huge impacts on individuals leisure lives while some minority group ...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... among youngsters to sharpen the mind Furthermore in the medieval period young...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...mong youngsters to sharpen the mind Furthermore in the medieval period youngsters spent...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 232.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34482758621 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70881767979 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650862068966 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 232.0 20.2975951904 1143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1240.0 106.682146367 1162% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 232.0 20.7667163134 1117% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 57.0 7.06120827912 807% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152504318606 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152504318606 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649107029752 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535694730955 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 119.7 13.0946893788 914% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -172.46 50.2224549098 -343% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 95.0 11.3001002004 841% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.17 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 20.25 8.58950901804 236% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 9.78957915832 603% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 94.8 10.1190380762 937% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 95.0 10.7795591182 881% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.