Recently, people have had different views about the issue of whether foreign language speakers may face some social and practical problems. Although settling down in another country can lead to many troubles, I am convinced that it provides many considerable opportunities.
First of all, the population diversity is certainly positive, it makes the country active. People live in the country where they have to speak a new language would be more knowledgeable. Because they know more language and cultures, they usually bring fresh blood to the society. Furthermore, they are valuable for many international businesses, For example, if Canadian companies want to expand business in Vietnam, they have to deeply understand the culture of Vietnam. Thus, companies would like welcome and hire people who are living in Canada but originally come from Vietnam before they actually expand.
In addition, some people argue that living in a country where they must speak a foreign language is one of the reasons for suffering discrimination. However, it can be solved by companies, governments, institutions, and individuals by implementing serious policies, rules, and anti-discrimination laws. For instance, in Canada, if the employers treat workers who have a different voice with native people, it can be seen "Language Discrimination", and they will be punished as long as workers claim it.
In conclusion, the advantages of living in a country and speaking a new language are obviously more than disadvantages such as some possible social and practical problems. It will be dominant and reasonable once all individuals in the society, like employers and governments, take combined efforts on dealing with these problems due to the diversity.
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 61
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in six Gulf countries 56
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in six Gulf countries 73
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in different Gulf Countries from 1990 to 2000. 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50607287449 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26762034012 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603238866397 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9499687109 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.636363636 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8181818182 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311860374458 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113686706363 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884706873042 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183342940788 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325830430968 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.