The maintaenance of public libraries is a waste of money because of computer technologies that have the same function. To what extent fo you agree or disagree?
Preserving libraries for public usage is considered to be a waste of money as computer programmes nowadays have the same abilities. From my perspective, I strongly oppose to this viewpoint although computer plays a crucial role in searching information.
To begin with, it is undeniable that most academic searching is now based on computer's searching tool. This is because computers are nowadays equipped with effective searching tools which require a small amount of time waiting for a thousand results. This is therefore useful for students and scholars, who have such a busy schedule and cannot attend to the library during operating hours. Moreover, the Internet provides a far more greater source of information in various fields compared to traditional libraries so it is necessary for students and scholars access to them.
On the other hand, I would like to argue that modern computers cannot replace a traditional libraries as libraries provides human beings a huge source of information. Although computers do serve a similar function, not many of information is reliable. For example, Wikipedia is a popular ecyclopedia which provides people knowledge about various fields such as history, science and music. However, the website is editable so that everyone can fix the information by themselves. Furthermore, public libraries occupy local history information, which has never been uploaded on the Internet. To illustrate, local libraries preserve the antiques from earlier people living in the neighbors and ensures authentic record of local history knowledge passed from the ancestors. As a result, going to the libraries is the only way to get access to the local history information.
In conclusion, despite the convenient of online sources of information, there are sufficient grounds to reject the view of not maintaining local libraries. It is recommended that people should read more to broaden their knowledges about various fields around them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-01 | ngangungo0701 | 78 | view |
- The maintaenance of public libraries is a waste of money because of computer technologies that have the same function To what extent fo you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'greater' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: greater
.... Moreover, the Internet provides a far more greater source of information in various fields...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'library'?
Suggestion: library
... computers cannot replace a traditional libraries as libraries provides human beings a hu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47868852459 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94825753977 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570491803279 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9051595836 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.4 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160680714832 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552198754606 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682519355647 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100358115893 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767807176061 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.