Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Doing unpaid work is considered to be a major topic of concern in today’s world. Some people believe that this should be compulsory in the school curriculum, while, individuals advocate that doing unpaid work such as working for a charity or improving the neighbourhood should be based on youngsters’ willingness. From my perspective, I partly disagree with the viewpoint.
To begin with, it is undeniable that doing volunteer work is strongly important in normal life as it does good for society and students by then realize the utmost value of doing charity. In other words, doing charity work could help them open their mind and understand the hardship of working. As a result, this could help children to understand moral and social values, as well as improve their abilities in the long run. For example, children working in a charity will understand the troubles that people suffered and sympathize with them and gain some new experiences of working in a strange field. Thus, those skills will help children to be more self-centred and mature.
However, there are several reasons why volunteer work should not be added to the schools' curriculum. Firstly, it is undeniable that students nowadays are busy with their school tasks and homework and they have little time for their hobbies. If volunteer work were added to the schools’ curriculum, students will have to pay extra time for it. As a result, they will likely get tired and lose their enthusiasm doing volunteering. Consequently, volunteer work is no longer beneficial to the students as they do volunteer by credit..
In conclusion, although some people believe that volunteer jobs should be added to the curriculum, individuals advocate that students should willing to do the jobs.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The maintaenance of public libraries is a waste of money because of computer technologies that have the same function To what extent fo you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...lunteer work should not be added to the schools curriculum. Firstly, it is undeniable t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... students as they do volunteer by credit.. In conclusion, although some people b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15034965035 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80528770399 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517482517483 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4126079885 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.214285714 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325124000674 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116590942706 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930784945371 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222118344109 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104956265484 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.