Due to human being’s overexploiting, a number of animal species are going to extinct at a terrifying speed. Some people hold the opinion that both the governments and citizens should make efforts protecting those animals from dying out. However, others think compared with animals conservation, solving social issues is more urgent. I deem that we should put the social issues at the top priority, but the protect of animals should also be concerned about.
The food chain is constituted by humans and all kinds of animals, and each species is essential in nature, playing a vital role in the biosphere. Therefore, we humans should male our utmost to protect them from dying out. Otherwise, the ecological balance would be broken up and we would be punished by nature. For example, Japanese whaling has caused great damage to the eco-system and this activity is banned by the United Nations. Apart from the important status held by animals, these creatures are also of great value in terms of biology. The abundant genes carried by them can help scientists explore the process of evolution.
On the other hand, there are a large number of problems in human society, which are more relevant to us people. For instance, public services are still in need of improvements, such as education, medical system and transportation. Some people believe that if the money used for animals protection is spent on public sectors instead, citizens’ daily life would be significantly benefited, imagining that problems like education inequality and traffic congestion are resolved. In contrast, expenditure in protecting endangered animals can not have a direct effect on our living.
I think governments should focus on solving social problems at first because they are more related to our lives. But we should also take measurements to protect endangered animal species, they are vital to maintaining the natural balance.
- Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some people saythat countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out, while others say that we should concentrate more on problems of human beings. Discuss both sides and 89
- Volunteer work organiazed by middle schools brings more benifts than problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 408, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... social issues at the top priority, but the protect of animals should also be concerned abo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nimals should also be concerned about. The food chain is constituted by humans ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sts explore the process of evolution. On the other hand, there are a large num...
^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tion. On the other hand, there are a large number of problems in human society, which are mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot have a direct effect on our living. I think governments should focus on solv...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, apart from, for example, for instance, i think, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26623376623 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84044708674 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594155844156 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4824959148 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.375 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339857314134 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103506359365 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863273788849 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199711613524 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869049641941 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.