There is no doubt that the burgeoning population has been becoming a major problem in the world, therefore, buildings needed to be built for the public. while some individuals of the society believe that new buildings should be constructed in the major cities and others think that rural area can be utilized to cater the need of new homes, I also opine that if buildings constructed in the regional area It will prove fruitful not only for the public but also for the environment.
To commence with, the predominant reason behind the new buildings had not better be allowed in the metro cities. First and foremost is that these cities are overpopulated, if new public allowed in this area, they will need all basic facilities. As a result, the crisis of basic things will increase such as water, electricity and so on and supply of these things already lacking behind the demand. Apart from this, since the pollution rate would is inclined, the number of people who use private vehicles which release obnoxious gases. it can deplete the ozone layer which is protecting human bodies from harmful radioactive.
On the other hand, the government will not offer new infrastructure, medical facilities, and transport facilities unless new habitats are constructed in that areas. these facilities not only offer benefits to the existing individuals but also interact with new youth to live in the countryside areas. As well as, the living standard of the public can be improved. Moreover, the environment of the countryside area is clean and quiet which is beneficial for the public and society. Finally, spreading towards the undeveloped area can have economic prosperity for the country. Businesses and residentials can hire more cheap resources like land, labor, etc. in a rural area which in return will create more jobs for villagers apart from traditional occupations for the personal and economic growth of villages.
In conclusion, given the aforementioned above information I would conclude that although cities have basic facilities such as medical, education facilities which will have to offer to countryside area which can increase the burden of the government, countryside have more spacious areawhich can be utilised for constructive purpose.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ings needed to be built for the public. while some individuals of the society believe...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'bettered', 'welled'.
Suggestion: bettered; welled
...reason behind the new buildings had not better be allowed in the metro cities. First a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a, they will need all basic facilities. As a result, the crisis of basic things ...
^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...om this, since the pollution rate would is inclined, the number of people who use ...
^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...vehicles which release obnoxious gases. it can deplete the ozone layer which is pr...
^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...habitats are constructed in that areas. these facilities not only offer benefits to t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23140495868 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84770412009 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528925619835 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.5811116834 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.6 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258001686269 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815691461184 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722732455577 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160531672695 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676222010614 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.