Evidently, growing population become a main issue in many countries followed by the increase in new homes need. However, the topic emphasizes whether new dwellings should be constructed in existing cities or in countryside. I strongly concur with the idea of building new towns and now this essay will examine the both views.
Undoubtedly, many metro cities in different countries are highly populated. Constructing new accommodations in high dense cities will generate many problems related to the lack of basic needs such as water and land which increase the living cost. For instance in Surabaya, the average of living cost and properties are much higher than suburbs are in East Java, Indonesia. Additionally, in line with the increase in housing, the amount of vehicles will rise significantly causing worse traffic congestion and air pollution.
On the other hand, expanding accommodations in countryside will provide more benefits such as cheaper cost of land, higher quality of water supply and healthier living environment. Moreover, the other facilities can be built along with the residentials including entertainment and business giving more chance for villagers to find job. In addition, the business investors can also hire cheaper labor and resources which beneficial for economic growth of the country.
To sum up, expanding housing needs in countryside will give more positive impact to the quality of life of the inhabitants and also give more economic prosperity for the country.
- The following chart illustrates the results of a British survey taken in 2005 related to Housing preferences of UK people 84
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 73
- The table below shows how young people in Tokyo Japan listened to music over the previous month The pie chart shows a record company s international findings about whether people preferred live or recorded music Summarize the information by selecting and 84
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods
- The Maps below gives information on the Village Park ten years ago and now 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, in addition, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92778398436 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606837606838 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.638516009 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.818181818 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302791012729 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105057497152 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978864082261 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173824893346 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148468980712 0.056905535591 261% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.