As many metropolitans are popping up in the modern era, people have a tendency to relocate from rural areas to the urban ones. This has raised a debate that the number of countryside residents is plummeting. In my view, this trend shows both negative and positive development for some reasons.
On the one hand, in terms of positive effects that countryside citizens emigrate to urban area, people will have more chances join the labor workforces which is a scarce resource in cities. Particularly, since many skycrapers are being erected, it requires an enormous force of heavy labors which are redundants in the countryside. Moreover, the youngster generation is nourishing their dreams which only happen and thrive under the metropolitan condition. For instance, since there is a huge demand in heavy duties workers such as builders, the unemployed is provided which opportunities to earn for a living, while young residents are able to pursue their ambitious in well-known enterprises or organizations.
On the other hand, Because of the immigrating waves happened for many decades, the reality of overpopulation is inevitable. Additionally, since there is a significant number ofpeople relocate to cities looking for better employment possibilities, vacancies for accomodations are now unavailable. Furthermore, traffic jam has always been an issue for city planners, so when more people commuting, the condition will be more excacerbated. For example, workers who can not afford rental flats since the rising demand of accomodations, they become homeless which means they will have to stay under bridges making urban esthetic looks dreadful in tourists' eyes. Nevertheless, more people commuting leads to more carbondioxide emissions. As a result, global warming will get worse.
In conclusion, I admit that city life offers more chances of employments and nourishing youngsters' dreams,however, the drawbacks are unsolvable issues within years but decades. Hence, it is crucial to maintain the population ratio between rural and urban areas appropriately.
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams e g football However some people think that it is more beneficial to play individual sports e g tennis and swimming Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them Do you agree or disagree 89
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and less time on outdoor sports Why is it a positive or negative development 84
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...warming will get worse. In conclusion, I admit that city life offers more chance...
^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,
...oyments and nourishing youngsters dreams,however, the drawbacks are unsolvable is...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55238095238 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1534309861 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7221679406 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.6 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144744669107 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049992862611 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447537390168 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988902797647 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659737219251 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.