The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007

The pie charts detail the rationales for immigration to and emigration from the UK in
2007.
Overall, immigration was mainly related to various kinds of work, study, and
accompanying someone, with no reasons stated and other less typical. Emigration
was similarly focused on work (non-definite work being more prevalent) but formal
study was a less likely reason and less defined reasons were more common.
In terms of study and work, 30% of immigrants came to the UK for definite jobs, just
1% above the number emigrating for the same purpose. The disparity regarding
looking for work was greater (12% for immigration and 22% for emigration) and even
more significant concerning formal study (26% immigrating and just 4% emigrating
for school).
There was relative alignment for other reasons with 11% immigrating with another
purpose and 14% emigrating, comparable to the figures for accompanying another
person (15% and 13%, respectively). Finally, only 6% of individuals immigrate to the
United Kingdom without a reason, while three times this figure emigrate lacking a
stated purpose.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gration to and emigration from the UK in 2007. Overall, immigration was mainly r...
^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted to various kinds of work, study, and accompanying someone, with no reasons st...
^^^
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tated and other less typical. Emigration was similarly focused on work non-defini...
^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ite work being more prevalent but formal study was a less likely reason and less ...
^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s came to the UK for definite jobs, just 1% above the number emigrating for the s...
^^^
Line 8, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he same purpose. The disparity regarding looking for work was greater 12% for imm...
^^^
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igration and 22% for emigration and even more significant concerning formal study...
^^^
Line 10, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y 26% immigrating and just 4% emigrating for school. There was relative alignmen...
^^^
Line 12, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easons with 11% immigrating with another purpose and 14% emigrating, comparable t...
^^^
Line 13, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to the figures for accompanying another person 15% and 13%, respectively. Finall...
^^^
Line 14, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... only 6% of individuals immigrate to the United Kingdom without a reason, while t...
^^^
Line 15, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ree times this figure emigrate lacking a stated purpose.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, regarding, similarly, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50877192982 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83521413263 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614035087719 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4626387467 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.571428571 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 13.0 3.83414634146 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23930358461 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135649805283 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123888634383 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822805690438 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898747808299 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.