In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing.
Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
The migration of rural individuals has become a growing concern in many disparate parts of the world. While some people claim that it is beneficial to move into cities, the drawbacks outweigh the benefits as this tendency has an adverse influence on urban growth.
There is a common belief that allocating in developing cities brings people a variety of potential occupations, leading to an increase in their earnings which can contribute to the prosperity of rural areas in turn. Furthermore, this trend also offers those who are disadvantaged the responsibility to get access to contemporary technology and therefore, ease the misunderstanding that job privileges are for citizens only. Others also claim that migrating to modern cities can engender cooperation between different minority groups as having a compatible chance for comprehensive development.
However, I contend that there are severe consequences when the population in the countryside decreases. Firstly, this tendency creates a lack of business operations and agricultural enhancement in rural areas and thus results in unbalanced growth between the provinces and cities as the principal labor forces, especially farmers, have dramatically declined in the countryside. As a result, the insufficiency of labor leads to wealth disparity since most high-salary jobs occur only in towns. Secondly, the most detrimental effect is ascribed to overpopulation in urban, which negatively affects not only the inhabitants’ living standards but also the environment. Taking my region as an obvious example, people living in its central city have suffered from noise, air, and water pollution and traffic congestion, resulting from the migration of rural people.
In conclusion, despite the belief that the Public can reap the benefits of more appealing professions in cities, I am of the opinion that this migration is undoubtedly a negative development that poses an alarming threat to society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-18 | tsln7607 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | hau le | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | hau le | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | tran quynh | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60269360269 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19645503062 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622895622896 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.5951322261 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.272727273 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190294169285 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653147488923 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374133747205 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108548544993 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276742770058 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.