In many countries, few people are highly paid and extremely rich, some people think that it is better for the country, other people say that government should restrict salaries and should not give more than the certain extent. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The proportion between the rich and the poor in many countries is wider than the sea, but it makes the country looking good. In order to like that, some people argue that governments should take some action to determine the ceiling of their salaries. This essay will discuss both of these and try to give some conclusions.
Millionaires in many countries become richer and richer because of their businesses. One person tends not to have only one project. For example, a rich society will know each other well so that they decide to be a partner in a national company and our country get more taxes and profits from foreigners. Hence, I think that those taxes can levitate people’s lives such as healthcare and habitats. Besides businessmen, because salary people have much work to do including a chief executive officer, they must do OT therefore, this is the reason why they attain many wages. As their skills, they can make a whole picture of the countries better. To sum up, it is not the only negative idea that people are paid a huge amount of money because the country gets some benefits from that.
However, the previous one was not suitable for middle class people as they might think that the governments should address this issue by limiting maximum salaries. At the first point, this means that it will be fair for every class of people in the country if the governments pay not as much different as salaries. Secondly, governments will have more funds to invest money in healthcare and public transportation for citizens. These are positives but if the governments solve this problem by salary restriction, working people will become less ambitious. To illustrate, why they have to work hard to get the same rate of money and they will not have pace in working anymore. Although it might be better to bring that money to develop the country, the country will be the ancient part of the world unless the governments do not think another way.
In conclusion, I think that paying more and more money on intelligent people is not a bad idea and also for determining to ceil of people’s salaries if the governments can balance it both as well as tackle those problems.
- In many countries few people are highly paid and extremely rich some people think that it is better for the country other people say that government should restrict salaries and should not give more than the certain extent Discuss both views and give your 73
- Nowadays in some countries the numbers of children aged 15 and younger are increasing What are the current and future effects of ever increasing population 78
- some people work for the same organization 89
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hese and try to give some conclusions. Millionaires in many countries become ri...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... country gets some benefits from that. However, the previous one was not suitab...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... governments do not think another way. In conclusion, I think that paying more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... if the governments can balance it both as well as tackle those problems.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76781002639 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55580635305 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496042216359 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1972614975 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.294117647 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2941176471 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35294117647 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353527855907 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111329706758 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591605488645 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235786779592 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462243700699 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.