In many countries, government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access. Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money?
In this day and age, more and more public attention has been placed on the huge amount of governmental funding into the development of internet access. There are several factors leading to the investments into this technology , and I agree that they are not the most widely used budgets.
There are several reasons why the government spends a large amount of money on enhancing the quality of the internet. Firstly, the internet is a tool for people to study. In fact, both adults and youngsters can broaden their horizons through watching useful videos on the internet. Take myself as an example, two years ago, I often researched knowledge in ebooks through the internet before going to school; therefore, I was praised by my teachers for my academic improvement. Secondly, thanks to the wide availability of the internet, citizens can keep in touch with others by using social networking sites. Take my sister as an example, she has a best friend who lives far from home and my sister, but they have kept in touch for six years through social apps such as Zalo and Facebook.
I strongly believe that large financial spending on such a field could be inappropriate. Firstly, modern technology is now enough to meet human needs, so this requires more no investment. For instance, in Vietnam, it is rare to have to wait long to load a website because of the fast speed of the internet, so local authorities are unlikely to upgrade internet infrastructure. Secondly, money should be spent on building hospitals. Take my village as an example, many residents suffering from Covid 19 without receiving timely treatment, so we need local authorities’ budgets to build quarantine areas and hospitals in order to fight this virus.
In conclusion, there are two main factors that foster the state to improve internet access, and I trust this is not the most optimal way for money to be used.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-20 | nguyễn nga | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | nguyễn nga | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | nguyễn nga | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | nguyễn nga | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | nguyễn nga | 61 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
- In many countries government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 61
- The graph and chart below give information about species extinctions and the threats to plant life 73
- In many countries government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... to the investments into this technology , and I agree that they are not the most ...
^^
Line 2, column 647, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
.... Take my sister as an example, she has a best friend who lives far from home and...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.903125 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73577013532 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8258044857 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.071428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207647095091 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757948949311 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855490547698 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122295901846 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363563194051 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.