In many countries, government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access. Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money?
In this day and age, more and more public attention has been placed on the huge amount of government funding into the development of internet access. There are several factors leading to the improvement of the internet, and I agree that it is not the most suitable use of government money.
There are several reasons why the government spends a large amount of money in order to enhance the quality of the internet. Firstly, the internet is a tool for people to entertain and study. In fact, both adults and students can expand their knowledge and relieve stress through watching useful videos on the internet quickly. Take myself as an example, 2 years ago, I often researched the knowledge in the textbooks through the internet before going to class at school; therefore, I had been praised by my teachers for my improvement in my studies. Secondly, thanks to the wide availability of the internet, citizens can keep in touch with others by using social networking sites. Take my sister as an example, she has the best friend who lives far from home but they have kept in touch for six years through social apps such as Zalo or Facebook.
I strongly believe that large financial spending on such a field could be inappropriate. Firstly, modern technology is now enough to meet human needs. This is because residents can utilize the internet with high speed, and they can do everything they want with high precision and fast speed. For instance, in Vietnam, it is rare to have to wait long to load a website because of the fast speed of the internet. Secondly, there are other pressing fields which require the capital disbursement to deal with. To be more specific, we need to have a huge amount of government money to purchase good services and construct hospitals in order to treat diseases. Take my village as an example, there are many people with Covid 19 outside the community in my village,so we need local authorities’ money to build isolation places and hospitals to be able to treat covid 19 and improve human health.
In conclusion, there are two main factors for the government to improve internet access, and I trust this is not the most optimal way to be used for money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-20 | nguyễn nga | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | nguyễn nga | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | nguyễn nga | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | nguyễn nga | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | nguyễn nga | 61 | view |
- In many countries government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 61
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In many countries government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 61
- The graph and chart below give information about species extinctions and the threats to plant life 78
- In many countries government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 757, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , so
...d 19 outside the community in my village,so we need local authorities’ money to bui...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7532808399 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60312414807 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530183727034 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9767264494 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.1875 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280905604355 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975236011372 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108606368633 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212185985352 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761326691257 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.