In many countries ,mainly tourists but not local people visit museums and historical places why does this happen an what can be done to attract to visit these places?
Museums can mostly preserving the rich culture and heritage of the any nation. Although, it is commonly observed that most of the visits paid by the tourist instead the local people, so this essay shall analyse the rationales as well as some best way to attract the local people along with the lucrative conclusion in the upcoming paragraph.
To begin with, there are reasons behind the local people do not visiting the museums. Firstly, most of the local masses are already well aware about the history related to cultural heritage so that decreases their interest. Not only this, nowadays masses are busy in their work so these busy time does not allow to visiting the local people such as museums, and historical monuments. Further, due to the expensive charges of the museum they do not want to visit these type of places.
On the other hand, there are myriad remedies which allure the nearby dwellers towards the local museum. The prime one is that, authorities should create the awareness among the localities to endorse the rich culture of their nation. Furthermore. Local museum authorities should defuse the charges of the entry as well as also they should give the discount offers to the local people with the entertainment sources as well as cultural events are also helpful to fascinate the nearby dwellers along with the tourists.
In addition to this, there are many other solution of this peril. First of all, if the fancy advertisement telecast on the television about the history of the local museum which is useful to gain attention of the local multitudes. Moreover, local schools id organised some educational trips to the historical monuments which can gain the interest of the every children.
To concluded, promoting the museum is crucial to pay visit by the nearby dwellers along with the travellers so the government and the museum authorities must try the best way to attract them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-03 | Komalsandhu | 87 | view |
- The chart below shows household spending patterns in the two countries between 1980 and 2008. 40
- The two pie charts below shows the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 73
- The chart below shows the make and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000. 56
- Some people think that in the modern world we have become more depend on each other while other think that people are now become self-dependent. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 73
- The graph shows the data about the annual earning of three different bakeries in London from 2000 to 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...dorse the rich culture of their nation. Furthermore. Local museum authorities should defuse...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...First of all, if the fancy advertisement telecast on the television about the his...
^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...f the local multitudes. Moreover, local schools id organised some educational trips to ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, such as, as well as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50574340267 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496875 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3545882398 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.076923077 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259889332296 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984967282335 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050842605642 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14755343978 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496182677118 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.