One of the most noticeable trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge in the number of individuals purchasing a wide range of household goods like television, microwave ovens, and rice cookers. As such, there are both positive and negative sides to this trend. In my opinion, this apprehension seems to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate on my views in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, there is a deluge of arguments in favor of the trend of purchasing household goods. The most preponderant one is that it can significantly contribute to improving the quality of life. To elaborate, these household goods not only enhance comfort but also lead to numerous other benefits such as time-saving, energy efficiency, and increased productivity. Thanks to the wide range of advantages these goods offer, people can enhance the quality and productivity of their lives with much ease, efficacy, and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand in good stead as far as augmenting the overall well-being of individuals is concerned.
Furthermore, another pivotal aspect of the above-mentioned views is providing reliable justifications. They claim that purchasing household goods is crucial and critical for the development of society. To explain, these household goods contribute to the growth of various industries and employment opportunities, which leads to overall economic development. For instance, the study results published by the government of Australia between March 2014 and April 2016 clearly indicate that the trend of purchasing household goods has positively impacted the country's economy and contributed to improving the quality of life for its citizens.
However, there are some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of the trend of purchasing household goods. The primary one lies in the fact that these goods can lead to overconsumption and contribute to environmental degradation. Hence, it is apparent why many people consider it as a negative development.
To conclude, despite having some drawbacks, the potential benefits of the trend of purchasing household goods are indeed too great to ignore. These goods contribute significantly to improving the quality of life and economic development
- The maps below show changes in the city of Nelson in recent times Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 71
- Some people think that companies should provide employees with exercise time during the day 61
- In many countries there is not enough recycling of waste material paper glass can What do u think are the reasons for this situation What can be done to encourage more recycling Give relevance reason and examples 67
- The pie chart below shows the frequency of U S Adults online purchasing habits in 2015 while the bar chart shows a further classification denoting online purchasing preferences Summarise the data by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 78
- Some people think that the best way to improve road transport safety is to let the driver test each year To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52011494253 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14907262687 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528735632184 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8721086826 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.722222222 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225660650519 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686842029372 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486612179492 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126311314412 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607088326348 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52011494253 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14907262687 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528735632184 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8721086826 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.722222222 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225660650519 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686842029372 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486612179492 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126311314412 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607088326348 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.