One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of individuals believing that higher authorities must be responsible for the crime prevention. While, others oppose it by saying it is up to people to protect themselves. In my opinion the former apprehension seems to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, there are deluges of arguments in favour of government should be responsible for preventing crime in society. The most preponderant one is that the government has the responsibility to allocate more funds to policing the streets. To elaborate it, in order to regulate rules and regulations higher authorities has the power to enforce rules with the help of money. This is because they lend money to petrol units. When police have better base to control crimes with the help of modern equipment they can easily prevent crime. These kind of products are costly. The more money shell out on these services crimes can be easily controlled. Thanks to the wide range of advantages higher authorities offers to prevent crime. Their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Furthermore, another pivotal aspect of aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help in one excel and thrive in varied areas. Besides, the government is responsible for keeping the public informed about risks and how those risks can be reduced. To explain it, people are busy in their jobs and businesses they do not have time to explore latest rules and regulation that helps them to reduce crime. It is up to higher organisations with the help of social media platform they must inform individuals about latest rules and regulation. For instance, the study result published by the N.H.R.C in March 2014 and April 2016 clearly indicates that it is government responsibility to prevent crime in society.
On the other hand, a section of society contradicts above mentioned views by providing reliable justifications they claim that people should learn self-defence and be aware of their safety on the streets. To make it justifiable, it is not possible for government to reach out to every individuals avoid critical situations that leads to crime. So individuals must learn about self-defence tactics. With the help of that they also can reduce crime in society. Hence, it is clear why many people consider it as negative development.
To conclude, having pondered over above stated is is crystal that despite some drawbacks the benefits of crime prevention by higher authorities are indeed too great to ignore.
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don t need and can t afford What are the reasons for this behavior What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem 73
- We have three important parts of education reading writing and math Some people think every child will benefit from a fourth skill added to the list computer skills Do you agree or disagree 73
- In most of the societies the role of mother and father differs what are the causes of this difference what will be the parental roles in future 67
- In school and universities girls tend to choose art while boys like science What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e responsible for the crime prevention. While, others oppose it by saying it is up to...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ecause they lend money to petrol units. When police have better base to control crim...
^^^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...quipment they can easily prevent crime. These kind of products are costly. The more money ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'explore the latest'.
Suggestion: explore the latest
...and businesses they do not have time to explore latest rules and regulation that helps them to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'about the latest'.
Suggestion: about the latest
...a platform they must inform individuals about latest rules and regulation. For instance, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 605, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: C
...the study result published by the N.H.R.C in March 2014 and April 2016 clearly in...
^
Line 7, column 510, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'negatives'?
Suggestion: negatives
...is clear why many people consider it as negative development. To conclude, having pon...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 48, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...lude, having pondered over above stated is is crystal that despite some drawbacks the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, hence, if, so, while, for instance, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 41.998997996 181% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14988290398 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88929389989 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512880562061 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.0 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.239857818 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.625 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7916666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296955643837 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772781248599 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739549598732 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160847816279 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053512702381 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.