In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally. Why people buy imported food? What could be done to encourage people to buy local food?
Recent decades witnessed an upsurge in the number of people purchasing imported food, attracting a great deal of media attention. However, identifying the reasons would be the key to finding the solutions.
There are a multitude of reasons behind this pattern. First, Foreign products usually are of higher quality than those produced locally due to the discrepancies in manufacturing technologies and strict regulations. In fact, many vietnamese citizens are susceptible to food with carcinogenic coloring due to the government negligence of food safety and have to consume imported food with guaranteed quality instead. Second, many people are deemed to be prosperous and trendy when consuming products from other nations. It is implied that if individuals buy local items, they will be regarded as destitute and old-fashioned.
However this trend is not without solutions. First, the legislation of stricter manufacturing regulations would be enacted. This would lead to the reduction of local products without being thoroughly scrutinized, attracting more citizens to consume these items. Second, official authorities should increase higher tariff on imported products. This will lead to a causal relationship with a rise in costs of foreign items, discouraging local individuals from any activities of consumption and they will purchase local ones with reasonable prices.
In conclusion, the demand for imported food could be attributed to the low quality of local products and the false perception of foreign items’ value in consumers. However, It is the liability of citizens and governments to undertake the most practical and effective initiatives to tackle this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | msolanki | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | msolanki | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-04 | Jenny Trang Nguyen | 67 | view |
| 2018-09-18 | eyraen | 78 | view |
| 2017-06-23 | grahamoneil | 56 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote naturalenvironment, such as the South Pole. Do you agree or disagree with thisdevelopment? 73
- Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life. Others think it is better to develop a social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both views. 61
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of t 61
- In a global economy many goods including what we use on a daily basis are transported from other countries in a long distance To what extent do you think its benefits exceed its drawbacks 92
- People living in large cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
...d this pattern. First, Foreign products usually are of higher quality than those produced l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...rded as destitute and old-fashioned. However this trend is not without solutions. Fi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69960474308 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09914191217 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577075098814 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0749634826 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270213616998 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750064107272 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722207224083 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160987096438 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743328641524 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.