Many countries now face an economic downturn, so it is better for each country to focus on its own problems rather than helping other countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, economic downturns have become prevalent in various countries all around the world. there are different opinions about how to deal with these problems. one of these is the belief that some countries should choose to focus on their own problem instead of supporting other countries. I find myself in a complete agreement with this point of view.
Firstly, there is no guarantee that a country with its own economic issues can actually have enough resources to help the others nations. Wasting national resources in the foreign problems is pointless if that nation could not even solve the problems itself. it will be probably wiser if the country solve its own economic issues first, then come the foreign ones afterwords.
Secondly, different countries with different economic policies may perceive their economic problems under different views. In other words, the fact that each country has its own focuses in different issues means that a plausible solution for this country's problems may turn inappropriate for others' ones. An industry-focused country often apply a distinctive agenda in comparison with a agriculture-focused one.
Thirdly, it is unlikely for a country to accept the interfere from the outside border, despite of the friendliness. Those developed countries are likely to turn down the propose of supports from others. Furthermore, when a country propose supporting policies to the other, it often comes with a couple of specific agreements or deals which may be often disadvantages for that country.
In conclusion, helping and supporting the other countries when they are in need are the honorable actions but without doubts, they may be probably unrealistic in real life situations. Concentrating on strengthening economic power and solving completely economic issues is the correct choice for a nation before deciding to help the others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-17 | jyotinain | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | John Ipin | 67 | view |
| 2020-04-13 | Ulugbek Sobirov | 61 | view |
| 2020-04-13 | Ulugbek Sobirov | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-13 | Ulugbek Sobirov | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...various countries all around the world. there are different opinions about how to dea...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... about how to deal with these problems. one of these is the belief that some countr...
^^^
Line 2, column 259, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...uld not even solve the problems itself. it will be probably wiser if the country s...
^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...a distinctive agenda in comparison with a agriculture-focused one. Thirdly, it i...
^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... it is unlikely for a country to accept the interfere from the outside border, despite of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...loped countries are likely to turn down the propose of supports from others. Furthermore, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, even so, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40273037543 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94007445268 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559726962457 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5213124622 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.533333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325761052972 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112763848455 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751231028507 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184430880574 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595469431651 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.