In many countries people now wear Western clothes suits jeans rather than traditional clothing Why this happens Is this a positive or negative development

In recent decades, Western clothes have gained in popularity in many
countries, especially developing ones. Although the trend appears to
challenge the preservation of traditional fashion of those countries, it brings
more positive changes overall.

There are a number of reasons leading to that trend. First, thanks to
globalization, citizens of faraway countries are now able to purchase
Western clothes without leaving the country. In fact, they can even get better
deals purchasing those imported clothes because of increased competition
in the apparel industry. Second, the increase in freedom of choice in less
based more on personal preferences. For example, a citizen nowadays can
wear what he or she wants without having to take into account social
approval on clothing, thereby increasing the demand for Western apparels.

Even though the trend has received some criticisms over the years, it has
positively affected those countries at the other end. First, Western clothing
brings more variety to the existing market, giving customers more options to
weigh their decisions. It is clear that not all people wish to limit themselves
to traditional costumes on all occasions. In addition, by injecting Western
fashion into the market, traditional clothing can, in fact, stand out on special
occasions such as New Year or Independent Day. If traditional clothes were
worn on a daily basis, their value will be diluted, making Western fashion
appear more special in the eyes of not only the citizens but also tourists.

In conclusion, the development should be embraced because of its
overwhelming advantages. It not only benefits the citizens in different ways
but helps preserve the traditional fashion as well.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he increase in freedom of choice in less based more on personal preferences For e...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45353159851 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72110325497 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609665427509 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 269.0 20.2975951904 1325% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1467.0 106.682146367 1375% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 269.0 20.7667163134 1295% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 97.0 7.06120827912 1374% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 24.0 4.38176352705 548% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246501413438 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.246501413438 0.084324248473 292% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637736807409 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572139332419 0.056905535591 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 138.7 13.0946893788 1059% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -210.02 50.2224549098 -418% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 109.4 11.3001002004 968% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.81 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.03 8.58950901804 245% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 9.78957915832 603% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 109.6 10.1190380762 1083% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 110.0 10.7795591182 1020% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.