In many countries, people throw away a lot of food from restaurants and shops. Why do you think people waste food in this way? What can be done to reduce the amount of food thrown away?
Nowadays, as both women and men have been working outside of their houses and have not had enough time to cook meals for themselves, restaurants have been one of the main sources for providing all kinds of food. But during these years, much amount of ingredients have been thrown out by restaurants’ servants. There have been several reasons for this issue which will be mentioned later as well as practical solutions in order to decline the wasted nutritions.
To commence with, one of the main causes of nourishments’ wastefulness has been individuals’ tendency to eat warm food which has already been cooked. So they have not been fond of eating something that has been made several hours ago. This could be not only for increasing the possibility for bacteria to grow on, but also the alteration in food taste. For example, one cooked-meal that has contained meat could grow bacteria in itself which may poison humans. And also even it has been as healthy as before, their taste has gotten extremely different. This has propelled eating places to throw away every kind of their food in order to serve new ones for consumers.
To addict, although it could be difficult at first to solve this issue, there has been one considerable solution which could be taken. This useful key has been asking all the consumers to identify the capacity of their needs. For instance, applying various volume of every meal in their menu in order to be chosen the right dimension by people. As a result, people would be served the enough size of food which would be finished by them. Consequently, eating places would have less amount of wasted nutritions to be thrown out.
In conclusion, in today’s world where some countries have had difficulty to provide even enough nourishments for their citizens, it has been extremely unfair that lots of food have been wasted in developed societies. But nobody could expect people to eat some cooked-meal which could be threaten their health by growing several kinds of microbes. In general, by asking the right amount of food for consumers, eating places would be able to maintain their ingredients for others.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 78
- In developed countries one of the debating issue for students is to take a gap between their high school and college Although some believe they should take a break some believe they should start to study right after they finish their high school I think i 56
- linear process 78
- When cars and cyclists use the same roads there are often problems Why is this case What are the solutions 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...his issue which will be mentioned later as well as practical solutions in order to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95856353591 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60931014548 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505524861878 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5707456778 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.588235294 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183281262323 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709939515173 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516607861605 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130398841672 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237664863829 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.