In many countries, people throw away a lot of food from restaurants and shops. Why do you think people waste food in this way? What can be done to reduce the amount of food thrown away?
Nowadays, as both women and men have been working outside of their houses and have not had enough time to cook meals for themselves, restaurants have been one of the main sources for providing all kinds of food. But during these years, much amount of ingredients have been thrown out by restaurants’ servants. This essay will be regarded not only causes of this issue, but also the practical solutions which could be taken.
To commence with, one of the main causes of nourishments’ wastefulness has been individuals’ tendency to eat warm food which has already been cooked. This could be not only for enlarging the possibility for bacteria to grow on, but also the alteration in food taste. For example, one cooked-meal that has contained meat could grow bacteria in itself which may poison humans. And also even it has been as healthy as before, their taste has gotten extremely different. This has propelled eating places to throw away every kind of their food in order to serve new ones for consumers.
To addict, although it could be difficult at first to solve this concern, there has been one considerable solution which could be taken. This useful key has been asking all the consumers to identify the capacity of their needs. For instance, applying various volume of every meal in their menu in order to be chosen the right dimension by people. As a result, people would be served enough size of food which would be finished by them. Consequently, there would be less left-over food on clients’ plates to be discarded.
In conclusion, in today’s world where some countries have had difficulty to provide even adequate nourishments for their citizens, it has been extremely unfair that lots of food have been wasted in developed societies. But nobody could expect people to eat some cooked-meal which may be threaten their health by growing several kinds of microbes. Because of those reasons, one main way to modify this condition is to catering the exact amount of food which each individual has requested.
- linear process 78
- Some people believe than nowadays we have too many choices To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient Other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful What is your opinion 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- One of the debating issue for offenders who had served their prison sentence and they have been free is society again is reoffending their crime But there are some measures that could be taken in order to tackle this important problem 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97653958944 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6554766322 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536656891496 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9230009121 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0625 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218340227712 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809227788416 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529962156821 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146836510839 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219042705763 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.