In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society?
What is your opinion on that?
Over the past decades, it is widely believed that the medical advancement has fostered the longevity around the globe. Despite the ensuring enhancement on well-being of average citizens, this seismic shift has begot a financial burden to our society. The aim of this essay is set to explore the societal benefit pertainning to additional manpower and a detrimental effect on economy.
To begin with, there is ample evidence suggested that the old people nowadays are generally perceived as workforce in some less strained domain. In fact, compared to our ancestors, having shaped a healthy habit with regular workouts and nourishment, senior people are deemed engrossed in producing values to the communities in their late life. Recent empirical research from the Elderly Committee ascertained that 70% retirees participated in voluntary works entailing part-time music teaching and homework tutoring. Seen in this light, these extra workforce generated by the elderly are likely to ameliorate the increasing demands necessitating by their neighbours.
Although the benefits given to neighbourhood are remarkable, the impact of the expanding senior group on overall nation should not be overstated. What this means is the fact that the major livelihood of the elderly has a high tendency to be underpinned by social security and pension they earned from the past employers. Having conducted an extensive study, the Hong Kong University established that the number of retired people who count on pension or social security has quadrupled over the pass 20 years. Considering with this line of thinking, this national expenditure has cumulated with ageing population. Meanwhile, coupled with the allowance that subsidising the concession fee for transportation, the economic development would be hindered under the growing contention in globalisation.
In conclusion, while these passionate and committed senior workforce constitute auspicious assistants in the neighbourhood, they are also tentamount to impediments to national development. Yet, it is predicted that the ageing process will remain insurmountable in foreseeable future due to the progress of science and technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | wardiati | 56 | view |
| 2018-08-29 | RockyGagKy | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-17 | RockyGagKy | 89 | view |
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today's society.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- Scientists agree that many people are eating too much junk food and it is damaging their health. Some people think that this problems can be solved by educating people to eat less junk food. Other people believe that education will not work. Discuss both 89
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 84
- In many cities crime is increasing. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce crime levels? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71472392638 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11594995392 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641104294479 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0172140962 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 133.071428571 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902288247224 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274762110846 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026129879807 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0460576877727 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273631632067 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.