In many countries, the quality of life in large cities is becoming worse/ What do you think are the causes of this problem? What measures could be taken to solve it?
It is widely believed that the quality of life in some countries has been deteriorating. This essay will examine the underlying reasons for this phenomenon and propose plausible solutions to address the issue.
There are several compelling reasons for the deterioration in quality of life. First and foremost, the rapid pace of industrialisation has contributed to the proliferation of factories, which release significant amounts of harmful emissions into the environment. Daily exposure to these pollutants may cause respiratory issues among individuals, deteriorating their health without receiving appropriate medical treatment. For instance, Beijing residents have struggled with prolonged coughing due to the polluted air caused by industrial activities. Consequently, these health issues have forced many people to seek hospitalisation, leading to a reduction in the quality of life. In addition, overpopulation has also exacerbated individuals’ quality of life. Specifically, a sharp increase in global populations has necessitated governments to divert more financial resources to brand-new infrastructure, including institutions, hospitals and other facilities to meet the growing need. Nevertheless, the limited resources have prevented such initiatives, resulting in inaccessibility to those basic needs. Therefore, the quality of life of many residents in these areas may worsen.
Despite the above reasons, governments can take action to tackle the root causes of this issue. First, it is essential for governments to impose stricter laws on environmental protection. These regulations should demand industrial parks establish more waste management plants to ensure an environmentally-friendly environment, which enhances human health and the quality of their lives. Another feasible solution is to encourage individuals to avoid migrating to urban areas. The rationale for this lies in the fact that when residents live in the countryside, less pressure will be placed on the infrastructure in metropolitan areas. As a result, it is more convenient for people to access healthcare services and educational opportunities.
In conclusion, although there are many reasons leading to the deterioration of quality of life, several solutions can be taken to mitigate its negative impacts. While it is necessary for governments to enact harsher laws on environmental protection, it is imperative for individuals to stop migrating to metropolitan areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-01 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
- The graph below gives information about computer possession by households in one European country between 1997 and 2011 67
- The maps below show how the town of Harbone changes from 1936 to 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences What extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Employers should give their staff at least a 4 week holiday a year to help employees perform better in their jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- The research indicates that nowadays some consumers are less influenced by advertising than in the past What are the reasons and is it a positive or negative development 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99150141643 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.59361143238 2.80592935109 128% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592067988669 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1684197692 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.315789474 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5789473684 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142454788742 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048092147788 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484327604539 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954769856286 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242549038804 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.