Some people say in order to prevent illness and disease, governments should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Mitigating environmental catastrophes and housing issues can be a practical solution to eliminate various ailments and diseases. Although this viewpoint has significant merits, I argue that medical services should be given equal priority to prevent ailments for the following reasons.
On the one hand, minimizing the impacts of environmental pollution and housing issues can prevent the outbreak of various diseases. First and foremost, many insects in a contaminated environment can have a detrimental effect on human health, potentially causing fatalities. For instance, malaria - a fatal disease caused by mosquitos breeding in polluted water - has infected and killed thousands, necessitating governments worldwide to roll out vaccines to curb its widespread transmission. Consequently, the successful rollout of malaria vaccines has highlighted the need for financial resources to resolve environmental issues. Additionally, solving housing issues can prevent individuals from mental health issues. This is because when humans face a likelihood of homelessness, they are more inclined to panic about their safety. Therefore, if this uncertainty persists, they can suffer from various mental health issues, such as depression.
Conversely, enhancing healthcare can eradicate some ailments and safeguard human health. The proliferation of global populations has led to increased demand for food and other agricultural products to meet this growing need. Nevertheless, growing vegetables and other fruits may take several months to cultivate, which may not satisfy consumer demand. As a result, harmful agricultural practices - such as the use of fertilisers and pesticides - are applied to accelerate crop growth, potentially inducing some chronic conditions in consumers, such as cancer. Therefore, the distribution of national resources to medical services is essential to cure diseases caused by poisonous agricultural products.
In conclusion, while mitigating environmental pollution and housing issues can eliminate some diseases, I argue that healthcare services should receive equal government intervention to ensure human health. The rationale for this perspective lies in the fact that humans can contribute to a more sustainable nation when they are healthy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-24 | Tuan Harry | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | Huyenlbg87 | 73 | view |
| 2024-05-02 | too3ig | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
- People are living longer after they retire What are the problems What can be done to solve the problems 95
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Some people think that the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment while others believe that the main interest is in the world of business Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people suggest that the government should spend money putting more works of art like paintings and statues into towns and cities to make them attractive places To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In many parts of the world some famous people are considered as role models and they are having an increasing influence on the young Is this a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... this viewpoint has significant merits, I argue that medical services should be g...
^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ing issues can eliminate some diseases, I argue that healthcare services should r...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.128125 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36692465069 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596875 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5723780689 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5625 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125488753568 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433206274723 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488417572509 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826933967761 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296467918499 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.27 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.