In many countries, smoking is now illegal in public places. Many people believe that such a ban is justified. Do you agree or disagree?
Smoking is banned in parks, restaurants, public-transports, colleges and schools in many nations. This essay agrees with this statement because it will prevent passive smokers from having different diseases and also encourages smokers to quit.
The primary reason for not allowing smokers in public places is that this will prevent people from having to breath second hand smoke. Non-smokers develop different type of heart related diseases such as lung cancer, strokes and asthma, and something that non-smokers cannot avoid when they are near to a smoker. The British Health Council recently found that the non-smokers develop heart related diseases 4 times more than the smokers.
The second main reason is to ban smoking is to reduce the number of smokers by motivating them to quit the habit of smoking. Smokers and non- smokers when socialize, often smokers ostracized from the social group because always they should go out of the gathering to light up. This will encourage them to avoid smoking and feel more a part of the group. This happened in Ireland, the first nation in the world to ban smoking nationwide. So it reduced the number of smokers.
In conclusion, keeping smoking against the law will help innocent passive smokers from getting different diseases. Also it will reduce the smokers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | Dr. Blessy | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Dr. Blessy | 56 | view |
- In many countries, smoking is now illegal in public places. Many people believe that such a ban is justified. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them withbasic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 56
- The graph below given information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 67
- Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Wealthy nations should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...mokers from getting different diseases. Also it will reduce the smokers.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 212.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20754716981 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57452121517 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561320754717 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 506.74238477 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8005711281 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104549405539 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490428888033 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621780842183 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0720285663553 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427376193997 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.