In many countries today, both men and women need work full time. Therefore, some proper think men and women should share household tasks equally. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Some people believe that men and women should attended household tasks because both of them work in a full time jobs. Personally, i completely agree with this statement that individuals suffer from lack of time and family members should assist each other especially in this kind of tasks.
First of all, couples should divide household chores equally in the case of working full time. Thus, both of them are burdened with overloaded work issues, that at present, people are obsessed with tones of thing, which is not necessary but inevitable. In that case, males also should participate in household tasks, such as cleaning or cooking, however, it is a rife phenomenon that they are breadwinner of family. For example, men are able to give a hand to women in cooking, considering that they are more fortunate on it.
Secondly, attendance in household tasks is duty of males and females equally. Therefore, amenability should shared in the terms of being a family, taken into account that to juggle with work and family responsibilities at the same time is definitely difficult. Hence, according to psychologists binding force between family members become more stronger comparing other, that they expenditure time together, although men do not tend to participate in this type of activities.
In conclusion, while people may vary in their opinions, in my point of view, males should render assistance to females in household issues, because both of them are busy with their carrier what they work full time and have not got enough time for housework.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-01 | stara | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-13 | Shirley Lee | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | Shirley Lee | 67 | view |
- Children's education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some some or all costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 73
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 56
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s 61
- In recent years, many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people. Why is the case? What can be done to attract local people 67
- Nowadays most of people learn academic study in university, but others think we should encourage to learn vocational skills more, do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ld tasks because both of them work in a full time jobs. Personally, i completely agree wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...d chores equally in the case of working full time. Thus, both of them are burdened with o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
...ing force between family members become more stronger comparing other, that they expenditure ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 205, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
... busy with their carrier what they work full time and have not got enough time for housew...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09019607843 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71370282207 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580392156863 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8394738808 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.8 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.7 7.06120827912 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300553666036 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12299408065 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924785338345 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185707187429 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518575263996 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.