It has been suggested that all young adults should be required to undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community Would the drawbacks of such a requirement be greater than the benefits to the community and the individual young adults

It is a long time that these is a hot discussion among the users of social media regarding mandatory unpaid work for young adults. In this essay we would try to examine the pros and cons of such a requirement in relation to the communities and the individual young adults.
In many countries mandatory military services have been part of their laws. Normally in these countries people in the age of 18, especially eighteen-years-old boys, have to spend one or three years of their life in armies without or with a low range salaries.
However, such kind of requirements later changed in most of the advanced countries. Many countries eliminated any kind of unpaid services because of its disadvantages in comparison to its advantages.
Despite in the first glance it seems communities can benefit from a huge source of man power for free, but with a deeper look, some other negative consequences of such laws can be detected.
It has been said, it is something similar to nightmares for many juveniles to spend some years of their life for free. Particularly when someone does not like that duty or the environment that he or she has to work in.
Therefore, in many societies decided to cancel any law which force people to spend the most valuable time of their life for any kind of unpaid obligatory tasks.
In conclusion, although there could be some short-term benefits for communities by having laws that force young people to work for free for a specific period of their life, but due to the negative impacts that such laws can have in long-term on people of that societies, it is not recommended to keep these kind of laws and regulations.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ocieties, it is not recommended to keep these kind of laws and regulations.
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77622377622 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79597875316 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527972027972 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.2235568751 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.181818182 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202040168151 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757282262855 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682585359881 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931669557895 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696329064901 0.056905535591 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.