In many country around the world life expectancy is increasing.
Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages.
It is a prevailing reality that people are expected to live longer on a worldwide scale. This essay will cover its negative and positive sides, then elucidate why from my perspective, the benefits of this fact outweigh the drawbacks.
On the one hand, the advantages are discussed in two aspects: the fulfilment of one’s desires in a life time and useful advices that can be exploited. As the lifespan of human is stretched, more people live into old age, which gives them more time and opportunities to put the final mark on their before-death list. By this way, they will pass away in jubilation without regret. What is more, aged people might pass down to the posterity indispensable-to-succeed understandings. The immense collection of life philosophy and quotes alerting about scams inherited word by word from our forefathers is a prime example.
On the other hand, there are also adverse ramifications in terms of their health and burdens on the close ones. The aging in this regard has a high chance to result in more people suffering from acutely chronic diseases including Alzheimer, the blurry vision,... given that the immune system deteriorates by the time. The physical exacerbation also makes them unable to labor at old age whilst the expenditure for the whole family remains unchanged. Japan exemplifies this with the tradition of detaining parents, who they can not afford to provide for, days remotely in the middle of nowhere until passing away in the tombs built with their own hands. Nonetheless, the medical ameliorations now enable old people to be on the mend in an instant and more nursing homes, as well as welfare from the authority might ease strain on the shoulders of families.
To conclude, weighing both sides, I’m convinced that the disadvantages of living longer is outweighed by the advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-05 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- The most important consideration when choosing any career or job is having a high income To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The maps show the outskirts of the town of Fosbury in 1980 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In many country around the world life expectancy is increasing Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 11
- The bar chart shows the percentages of UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releant 78
- The maps show the outskirts of the town of Fosbury in 1980 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...s: the fulfilment of one’s desires in a life time and useful advices that can be exploite...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...s including Alzheimer, the blurry vision,... given that the immune system deterior...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nonetheless, so, then, well, as well as, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09240924092 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98254168488 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627062706271 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2630775321 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.214285714 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0646145716035 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0223562441385 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340316279802 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0543023636512 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378721504305 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.