Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourism industries. Why is this the case? Is it a positive development?
These days, nations having emerging economies are pouring thousands of billion dollar in their countries' tourism areas in order to expand and update them. Why does this tendency happen? This essay below will outline the reasons for the case as well as discussing its pros and cons.
It is not hard to see that the most popular development trend of countries today is to participate in global organisations where they can earn economy's benefits, boost relationships and exchange culture. Therefore, i believe that investing in travelling industries is one of the wise ways to exploit the advantages that it brings. First of all, a well-developed tourism industry can attract a wide variety of people coming to experience, thereby creating new businesses and jobs for local residents that is an enormous income for the economy. In 2019, for example, according to world tourism & travel council (WTTC) the tourism & travel industry contributed 10.4% of global GDP and over 330 million jobs. On the second point, promoting international tourism not only help to improve international relations with other countries but also is a chance to share a country's customs and culture with people all around the world by their festivals, traditional food, etc..
On the other hand, beside the benefits that this phenomenon manufactures, we can not ignore the accompanying negative impacts. Tourism growth puts pressure on the environment, the hordes of travellers from oversea often litter wherever they go and no bother to clean after leaving in areas they have visited, on average a tourist throw away about 1 kg of rubbish per day, this can lead to dirty roads and clogged sewage system in these places, which negatively and directly affects indigenous people's living conditions. Furthermore, accommodating and meeting the demands of visitors mean having to sacrifice native resources. For instance, in several well-known destinations of Vietnam, local people cut down a vast region of forest to build infrastructures for tourism. As a consequence, that causes the soil to degrade, destroying the habitats of native animals.
In conclusion, I would have to announce that expanding the tourism industry in a country is a positive development if it is properly managed. However, we should not only focus on the advantages that it produces, but do not care about the bad effects on the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-06 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-01 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-01 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | UP | 84 | view |
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below give information about the highspeed continuous internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002 92
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor Others think it has an opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles 73
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three di erent years who said they were interested in certain sports 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...nships and exchange culture. Therefore, i believe that investing in travelling in...
^
Line 3, column 962, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...y their festivals, traditional food, etc.. On the other hand, beside the benefi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2009.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25916230366 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93663989883 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630890052356 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.0125735618 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.933333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4666666667 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282901520996 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837719513794 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875306803624 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170941474775 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707190752009 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.