Many employees may work at home the modern technology. Some people claim that it can benefit only workers, not employers. Do you agree or disagree?
There has been a growing trend that workers are entitled to work from home thanks to technological advancements. Some people belive that only staff are beneficial , while company owners receive nothing from the movement. I somewhat disagree with this point of view as both wage-earners and their employers can reap benefits from the development, albeit there are few drawbacks.
Working at home acts as a predecessor to the enhancement in employees' productivity and job satisfaction, implying the merits for organizations. If people are allowed to work at their own safe haevens, they are relieved of the burden of managers' supervision, the factor plays a key role in impeding wokers' perfomances. Without the psychological disturbance, individuals thus work more effectively and make a greater contribution to their firms. Another virtue for people working at home is that they may have more time with their families, which enables workers to strengthen their relationships with other members. This provides working people with a sense of family solidarity and fulfillment, thereby focusing on and excelling at their jobs. Distance working makes employees happier and ameliorating them of negative implications at conventional workplaces; it is thus beneficial to employers.
Admittedly, there are still occassions when remote working can backfire. There are wokers who may take advantage of the lack of managers' observations for their own sake. It is not uncommon for salary earners to play games, or listen to music in the working hours. If there are no managers to supervise their subordinates, the issues may be exacerbated. These types of people, however, are few. The advantages of working from home are still underscored.
In sum, I mostly object to the view that only ordinary workers can be benefited from the phenomenon that workers work from home. While few individuals may exploit the entitlement for their own goods, the majority of people working at their places of living witness the improvement in working conditions, which means that employers are also merited.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-29 | Charles Le | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | Charles Le | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | Charles Le | 67 | view |
- People born today can expect to live longer than people in previous generations What are some of the positive and negative implications of this phenomenon Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- Some believe that younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting older family members when they become physically mentally and financially unable to look after themselves Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some scientist thinks that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Widespread of technology has given people more freedom to work instead of travelling to work or college Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantage 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...le belive that only staff are beneficial , while company owners receive nothing fr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41411042945 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0421387539 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558282208589 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1506543192 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.823529412 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304738903688 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959312424092 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541144009594 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195832263488 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552251917338 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.