Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that studying in schools would outweigh homeschooling. I am of the viewpoint that combination of the two learning strategy would offer various merits to children. Both reasons and impacts of the two learning methods will be elaborated below.
It is understandable why many advocate to acquisition of knowledge through technological devices. The first rationale is that technology breakthoughs in recent decades has enabled access to a wide range of learning resources available online. Students nowsaday could pick up either up-to-munite academic researches or past papers instantly that hold the key for their acedemic achievement in later life. Another support of this view is that students are less likely to be discouraged from hierrachy which deeply rooted in traditional education system. Finally, given the freedom to study, children are able to maintain their focus in essential subjects including math and coding which gives them distinct advantage over their counterparts in schools.
However, it is contrary to popular belief that traditional approach to education would tremendously benefit many aspects of student's natural development. In early years, interactions with peers would stimulate growth of one's communication skills and give them a sense of social solidarity. In addition, competition plays a vital role in establishment of the young characteristics and encourage flourishment of societies as a whole. It has not mentioned that online learning is the main culprit eye-related disorder and diseases. Similarly, kids may find it difficult to build long-lasting relationships which are fundamental to achieve a meaningful and happy life.
In the light of these facts, online study offes availability of numerous sources of knowledge, and help these young mind avoid unneeded subjects, while harmful to their eye's visions and ability to maintain social linkage. School learning on the other hand offset the negative impacts. Thus, both appraches should be combined to produce greater effect on the future generation.
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Many employees may work at home the modern technology Some people claim that it can benefit only workers not employers Do you agree or disagree 67
- people move to different places several times during their life Causes Is this a negative or positive development 84
- Widespread of technology has given people more freedom to work instead of travelling to work or college Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantage 89
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advocate seems to be countable; consider using: 'many advocates'.
Suggestion: many advocates
...orated below. It is understandable why many advocate to acquisition of knowledge through tec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ns with peers would stimulate growth of ones communication skills and give them a se...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, similarly, so, thus, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62580645161 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07958265751 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667741935484 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6162240456 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0953443708124 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028763869512 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.023624916153 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0555257772215 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0109735317027 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.