Many employees may work at home with the modern technology. Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers, not the employers. Do agree or disagree?
Technology nowadays are on each steps of your foot which has changes the current scenario of the world. Multitude of people think working at home only benefits employee, not the employees. I totally agree to this statement, because in terms of pros both are identical.
For employers one of the most cardinal income is, they do not need to purchase highly qualified storied building for workers these investment are dead assets for companies. By saving huge amount of money employers can give other accommodation to there workers for better consequence. Another important advantage is, using remote desktop technology an employee can rectify any critical issue without any hustle. Such advance system is a boom for customers and service provider because despite of the fact that they reside in the two extreme corners of the world, they can communicate an resolve any cumbersome technical glitch.
However as compare to past few years people are highly connected with automation world. One of the most advantage for employee can save there time which later on can be utilize with their family, they get flexible working hours at home. Another forth coming is, workers do not need to inhale highly flammable toxic from vehicles, which keep there body disease free. Adding to it they can also save there life from danger. For instance, survey show that most of the death are due to accidents of vehicles.
Speculating aforementioned views it can be comment that big corporate as well as there personnels are equally benefited by the latests technology advestment, that is capable of catering highly effective with minnale inputs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-22 | nirav malaviya | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | nirav malaviya | 56 | view |
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology. Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers, not the employers. Do agree or disagree? 78
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology. Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers, not the employers. Do agree or disagree? 56
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology. Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers, not the employers. Do agree or disagree? 78
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology. Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers, not the employers.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers not the employers Do agree or disagree 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this investment' or 'these investments'?
Suggestion: this investment; these investments
... qualified storied building for workers these investment are dead assets for companies. By savin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ners of the world, they can communicate an resolve any cumbersome technical glitch...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e any cumbersome technical glitch. However as compare to past few years people are...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 128, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'latests'' or 'latest's'?
Suggestion: latests'; latest's
...personnels are equally benefited by the latests technology advestment, that is capable ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58907527638 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637735849057 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4883840411 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181359032491 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658132947812 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768729961307 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113148324346 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485612724841 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.