Many ex-criminals commit crimes again after being released from prison. What are the reasons for these? What measures can be taken to solve the issue?
It is true that a bunch of criminals engage them in more unlawful acts after discharging from the jail. Although this tendency is ascribed to a host of reasons, effective policies can be adopted to remedy the predicament.
I would contend that unemployment is the burning issue of prisoners after an imprisonment. First and foremost, unemployment deprives wrongdoers of coming back to their ordinary life. In modern society, most employers would refuse them to recruit simply for past criminal records, thus, they fail to earn money for living. Nevertheless, it will be easier for them to subsist if they reunite with old criminal groups and become involved in illegal work. A recent survey stipulates that in America, 30% of hijackings have been committed by criminals who were in police custody for different periods. Therefore, we could argue that lack of job opportunity encourages criminals to carry out more crimes after a period of punishment.
Several viable solutions can be implemented to remedy the aforementioned issues. Firstly, the state ought to implement any rehabilitation program for prisoners in the jail, which will offer them self-correction by consulting with a psychologist. For Example, In Norway women’s jails provide such a program that weekly once or twice have to consult with a psychologist and improve their disturbing thought. This helps ex-convicts to find a way of dispelling the crime habit. Furthermore, as a member of society, we should welcome them if they want to work rather than reject criminal records. In this way, it will solve their joblessness issues as well as surviving costs.
In conclusion, it is imperative that the proposed solutions be universally adopted to tackle the problems that are certain to arise as the law breakers are just released from prison.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-10 | Bùi Hải Anh 25 | 84 | view |
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period 78
- Many people believe cities should not try to preserve their old historic buildings and instead they should destroy them and replace them with modern buildings To what extent do you agree 89
- Many ex criminals commit crimes again after being released from prison What are the reasons for these What measures can be taken to solve the issue 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25773195876 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99381553744 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632302405498 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3423987673 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248993915699 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743556485209 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362755490636 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143715294269 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193859602151 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.