Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are actually important for a country.
economic growth concerns most of the governments all over the world. Majority of them strongly believe that the only way of development is to pay attention to this issue, while some people disagree. They opine other progress such as cultural has the same value as money. I agree with the second idea in some extent and in this essay both views will be discussed.
However, a wealthy man might not be prosperous, a poor one is miserable absolutely. In one hand, at the point of view of governments, industry is the drive of economy. Productive and qualified industry leads to export that means earning more money and the amount of money distribution per person increases. For an instance, men with higher income, which caused by the administrative section efforts on economy, may be more satisfied, therefore the entire society becomes healthier.
On the other hand, it can be observed the rate of depressed people growth and it has nothing to do with the upward trend of their income usually. this reveals the amount of earnings not only cannot guarantees the happiness but also is the cause of emotional diseases. this shows policy makers must take actions on other aspects of their people such as culture or communication skills improvement. For example, official USA statistics illustrates that the working hours in America peaks significantly, although in the same period the family or friend’s reunion hours per week plummets almost to 30 minutes which can cause several serious problems in behavior. Thus, this point should be considered that the main goal of increasing the size of economy is reaching to the better life, not a gloomy one.
To summarize the article, although economic growth should be the first priority of governments, the other sides of nation should not be forgotten and those are as vital as monetary policies. In future states must distribute their effort on all characteristics of their folks whereas focusing on economy specifically.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-13 | MaKay1990 | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | Shahrear59 | 56 | view |
| 2017-02-15 | mabick_1527 | 76 | view |
| 2017-01-20 | Stephanie Kaushal | 86 | view |
| 2016-11-28 | MOKO | 89 | view |
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010 61
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Economic
economic growth concerns most of the governments...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e upward trend of their income usually. this reveals the amount of earnings not only...
^^^^
Line 9, column 269, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...lso is the cause of emotional diseases. this shows policy makers must take actions o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12654320988 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79956306332 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1967683776 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.733333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116792422875 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387248364566 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347129816264 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705552374223 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382293036066 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.