Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people,however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The progress of a nation is often measured by economic growth that is GDP (Gross product income) or per person income, therefore many governments focus more on their economic progress rather than other aspects. However some people believe that other factors such as social security, political stability and education are equally important. This essay will discuss both aspects of and provide relevant examples. I too personally believe that economic factor is important criteria but that solely does not constitute a nation's identity and several other factors are also given consideration.
Many nations, today strive for economic development and provide financial aid to aim for higher status among their peers in the world. This goal is achived by reviving the economy with various financial projects. Many grants and subsidies are provided to many small, medium and large businesses each year to provide employment and reduce poverty. For example, financial budget of India sets aside a large part of its income to create jobs and provide substantial amount to its youth.
Despite major focus on financial side, the nation however lacks the positive identity if the other aspects are not given equally importance. Social security, education and powerful political system are substantial. In other words, if citizens do not feel secure even after providing monetary compensation will be reluctant to support the economy. As well as corrupted politicians can make situation worse even if large amount of financial aid are provided to citizens. Coal scam and others are the latest example. Therefore educated and sound mind people can take their country on global platform for positive identity.
All and all, the government should not only look at economic transformation but the overall growth of the nation if they want to stand out. I firmly agree that any nation's development is not result of improving the financial aspect but verious other aspects are equally important.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-06 | LILY_JANE | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hau le | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | hau le | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-14 | thaohienpt008 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...mic progress rather than other aspects. However some people believe that other factors ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 516, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...a but that solely does not constitute a nations identity and several other factors are ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rovide substantial amount to its youth. Despite major focus on financial side, t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...scam and others are the latest example. Therefore educated and sound mind people can take...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ALL_AND_ALL[1]
Message: This phrase is nonstandard. Did you mean 'all in all' (=after all, nevertheless)?
Suggestion: All in all
...obal platform for positive identity. All and all, the government should not only look at...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...t to stand out. I firmly agree that any nations development is not result of improving ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36858974359 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61425118414 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9604785225 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.6875 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198034987576 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584686644419 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465206657278 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110869651867 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552651540233 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.