Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Governments typically prioritize economic progress as their primary goal, aiming to stimulate growth and create employment opportunities. However, some individuals argue that a country's development should encompass various dimensions beyond economic growth. They emphasize the importance of social, environmental, and cultural progress. In my opinion, a balanced approach that considers multiple aspects of progress is vital for a country's overall development.
Advocates of economic progress as the primary goal argue that it serves as the foundation for improving living standards and providing resources for social welfare programs. By focusing on policies that promote GDP growth, governments can create a favorable business environment and enhance the quality of life for their citizens.
On the other hand, proponents of a broader notion of progress highlight the significance of social, environmental, and cultural factors. Social progress entails ensuring access to quality education, healthcare, and social services, while also promoting equality and social cohesion. Environmental progress focuses on sustainable development and the conservation of natural resources. Cultural progress involves preserving cultural heritage, promoting the arts, and fostering diversity.
Neglecting these dimensions of progress can have adverse consequences. An exclusive focus on economic growth without considering social welfare may result in income inequality and social unrest. Ignoring environmental concerns may lead to ecological degradation and long-term consequences for future generations. Disregarding cultural progress can erode cultural identity and diversity, impacting social harmony.
Therefore, a holistic approach that integrates economic, social, environmental, and cultural progress is necessary. Governments should strive for sustainable economic growth that takes into account social welfare, environmental sustainability, and cultural preservation. By considering multiple aspects of progress, governments can create a more prosperous and harmonious society for present and future generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-06 | LILY_JANE | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hau le | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | hau le | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-14 | thaohienpt008 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that the experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life Others argue that experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence Discuss both views and give your own op 73
- Some people believe that the experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life Others argue that experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence Discuss both views and give your own op 73
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of living a number of different places during your childhood years 89
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of living a number of different places during your childhood years 78
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can be better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading To what extend do you agree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.60931899642 5.12529762239 129% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23233906438 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573476702509 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9846810317 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.470588235 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224927829869 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825339125634 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415361868147 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144064020612 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649866365383 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 12.94 50.2224549098 26% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.76 12.4159519038 167% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.