Many individuals prefer to talk online with their peers than going with individuals in surrounding networks. do you think the benefis exceed the odds.
Children are talking through online rather than going out with their peers. Online networks help to minimize the distance between individuals, which diminishes the direct communication or roaming around with friends. Owing to the fact that, the advantages of online relationships make a devastating effect on individuals and thereby the disadvantage outweighs the benefits.
There are many merits of online talks. Firstly, children can able to chat with their peers and solve their doubt instantly. They can make groups in online platform and would try to expand their knowledge and share ideas regularly irrespective of others time and schedules. Secondly, since the dawn of pandemic pupil could not have chances to go out and mingle with their friends as before. Similarly, preventing many of diseases, pollutions from outside would be mitigate when the people would stay inside the home and communicate through online media.
On the other hand, excessive use of and online conversation lead a detrimental effect on every individual. People spend huge time in online which affect their productivity and often develop many diseases includes physical and psychological problems. In addition, if they went outside and spend time with their friends , it would be cherish and explore the knowledge and social network to the core. For instance, walking with friends group in a beech would be a mesmirizing experience when compared to sit alone and chat online.
To sum up, it is inevitable to use online as a medium of communication, therefore more people are addicted to, instead of using nearby networks. However, the benefit would be minimal in contrast to merits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... On the other hand, excessive use of and online conversation lead a detriment...
^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...utside and spend time with their friends , it would be cherish and explore the kno...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34090909091 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79215704706 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609848484848 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6742211436 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.714285714 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267599964834 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930038150702 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689854894119 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155259902231 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924750592484 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.