In the modern world, more and more food and drink items containing sugar are produced, and they are said to be harmful to human health. Therefore, sugary product prices are expected to rise to persuade consumers to ingest less sugar. From my perspective, I believe that making sugary products more high-cost is an inappropriate solution.
Firstly, raising the cost is an unsuitable approach for some people. Sugar has become part and parcel of everyone's daily meals. If the price is higher, people who have a tight budget can not purchase many essential sugary foods such as bread, yogurt, and noodles, which benefit their health. As a result, they may lack the necessary nutrients to boost their energy, even having an effect on body development. It also dramatically affects the nation's economy and lifestyle because people no longer consume sugary products.
Besides that, if people increase the cost of sugary items, it will result in the redundancy of such products as people can not afford them. And then, the government has to work out a method to deal with this problem. Like addictive substances, when people are addicted to those, they may go to any lengths to get it, such as the poor, and addicts may riot or even rob, so a high price does not curtail their abilities to buy such expensive products.
In conclusion, making sugary products more costly is not a feasible solution as it leads to a shortage of essential nutrients, redundancy, and protests, affecting the nation's economy and lifestyle simultaneously. In my opinion, in this case, the government should raise people's awareness about the consumption of sugar. Potential disadvantages should be highlighted to assist individuals in deciding whether use sugar as a daily ingredient or not.
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high level of sugar which cause may health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 89
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 89
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...pment. It also dramatically affects the nations economy and lifestyle because people no...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...redundancy, and protests, affecting the nations economy and lifestyle simultaneously. I...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, may, so, then, therefore, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11034482759 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76983925752 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613793103448 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3864123278 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334564480546 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101397255543 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653842862045 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196870395572 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879538744015 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.