These days, a lot of museums and historical locations seem to appeal mostly to tourists rather than locals. In this essay, I will discuss several reasons for this happening and measures to attract more residents.
Numerous causes are contributing to the low number of locals visiting museums and historical sites. Firstly, it is easy to understand that most of the local citizens have already visited such places and may already have a great knowledge of their own culture and history, so they do not feel compelled to return to them frequently. Thus, the vast majority of visitors are tourists. Secondly, many locals are willing to spending their spare time and vacations in destinations other than their hometown or nation, since they are more enthusiastic about learning about other cultures and histories than their own.
Although it does seem very tough to tackle the locals with their hometown’s historical areas situation, there are a number of solutions that might help them to accomplish it. For one, local governments can develop museums on a regular basis by rotating items and displays to encourage locals’ interest. Different exhibitions, focused on different subjects or areas of culture, maybe shown and marketed more occasionally. Furthermore, governments might be allowing residents full access to such locations may attract more local tourists. On account of this, citizens from local will definitely be motivated to come to historical monuments more and more because they may have to live on a budget. Therefore, they cannot purchase a museum’s tickets especially when the tickets are too extravagant.
To summarize, a huge number of historical attractions are lean towards visiting by tourists rather than residents from local. Even though this can be attributed to a host of problems such as the knowledge or the demand of the locals, we can still handle this issue by upgrade the museums and the historical areas or free entry to such places for local people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'areas'' or 'area's'?
Suggestion: areas'; area's
...locals with their hometown’s historical areas situation, there are a number of soluti...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.246875 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7803983949 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5228373796 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.928571429 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338433647341 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114007072873 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068813541595 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209554457393 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513343629434 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.