Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
There exists a tendency that the number of travelers paying their visit to the local museums and historical sites is superior to the numbers of people in that region do. This essay aims to illustrate the causes of this phenomenon and suggest some feasible solutions to increase the attendance of local dwellers.
It is reasonable why museums and history-related attract more tourists than local people. The most popular cause is that tourists coming from other cities or countries always have a keen interest in exploring the local history and thus feel totally motivated to visit these places. For example, The Temple of Literature attracts million of foreign visitors per year to Hanoi to gain an insight into while the local citizens only visit on special occasions. This is because they are completely familiar with the history of the city and this landscape. Another reason is that the tourists do not know clearly about the nation’s currency so they tend to be willing to pay for all extra costs without any hesitation. These fees are created more and more due to the fact that tourism industry mainly contributes to the economy of many countries.
In order to raise the interest of local people in paying their visit to museums and historical sites, the authorities are recommended to apply some solutions. The first approach is to reduce the entrance fees or provide annual discount to local residents. People may pay less than usual if they go with a group of four or more, for instance. As a result, people will feel less burdened by their financial condition. Secondly, organizing varied activities which may incorporate new art performances is an effective way to attract people by grasping their attention and curiosity.
In conclusion, I believe that tourists often pay more visits to the museums and history-related places due to their greater sense of exploring and the willingness to afford the fee. Therefore, many courses of actions such as providing discounts or creating new kind of recreation must be adopted to awaken the interests of local inhabitants.
- The bar chart shows the number of people who visited different museums in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 84
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than living at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 73
- The charts show favourite social media channels in China in 2011 2012 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Sending criminals to prison is no the best method of dealing with them Education ans job training are better way to help them Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...mple, The Temple of Literature attracts million of foreign visitors per year to Hanoi t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08163265306 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74953237136 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577259475219 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.562157616 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.2 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414881279918 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123830580848 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683202745236 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236551139707 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357874706494 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.