Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantage of charging people for admission to museum outweigh its advantage?
Museums are the windows to our cultural heritage and tradition, and by all means, these should be promoted. Nowadays, a number of museums, demand an entry fee, whereas a few of them are free to visit. I believe, there are certain advantages and disadvantages of admission charges to the museum, and in this essay, I would argue in favor of having a reasonable entry charge to visit a museum.
On the one hand, by charging an entrance fee, there will be a reduction in the visitors to the museum, which will reduce its popularity in due course of time. For instance, when visiting a tourist destination, people would like to spend money on other more engaging attractions, rather than going to a paid museum, but this will not be the case if the entry to the museum is free. Furthermore, by adding admission tickets, there will be a fear of shifting the overall focus of such establishments, from academic to commercial accomplishments, which is not the true purpose of such places.
On the other hand, by asking for an entry fee, museums will attract only genuine people, interested in art and culture, rather than catering a mob that neither has a sense of appreciation nor discipline to visit such places. Apart from that, it will enable the museums to sustain themselves, with no or minimal dependence on government funds. It will allow any government fund allocated to these organizations, to be utilized in establishing new exhibits, rather than spending it on operations and maintenance purposes. This, in due course of time, will attract more visitors, and thus more profit. The Metropolitan Museum of the New York city is a perfect example of this type of system. However, the entry tickets should not be too expensive as extraordinary pricing will deter the public to visit the museum.
In conclusion, although asking for an admission fee, the museums have certain disadvantages, especially in terms of reduced footfall, however, if charged reasonably, it helps in improving the standards and facilities of these establishments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-14 | hieu19101995 | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | utkarshshahi | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | utkarshshahi | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-17 | varindersingh | 56 | view |
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe that not all criminals should be kept in prison, but that some of them should be allowed to do unpaid work to help the community. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- As the world becomes technologically advanced computers are replacing people at more jobs What are some job positions that may be lost because of computers What are some problems that may result from this situation 84
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual well-being.What factors contribute to job satisfaction?How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...the museums to sustain themselves, with no or minimal dependence on government fun...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, whereas, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02647058824 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98768377263 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547058823529 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.4556168822 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.461538462 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1538461538 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257828604767 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908399347049 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855501839667 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177759432022 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532634329957 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.