Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantage of charging people for admission to museum outweigh its advantage?
Museums are the windows to our cultural heritage and tradition, and by all means, these should be promoted. In recent times, a number of museums, demand for an entry fee, whereas a few of them are free to visit. In my opinion, there are certain advantages and disadvantages of admission charges to the museum, and in this essay, I would argue in favour of having a reasonable entry charge to visit a museum.
On the one hand, by charging entrance fee, there will be reduction in the visitors to the museum, which will reduce it’s popularity in due course of time. For instance, when visiting a tourist destination, people would like to spend money on other more engaging attractions, rather than going to a paid museum, but this will not be the case, if the entry to the museum in free. Furthermore, by adding admission tickets, there will be a fear of shifting overall focus of such establishments, from academic to commercial accomplishments, which in not the true purpose of such places.
On the other hand, by asking for entry fee, museums will attract only genuine people, interested in art and culture, rather than catering a mob that neither has a sense of appreciation nor discipline to visit such places. Besides that, it will enable the museums to sustain themselves, with no or minimal dependence on government funds. By doing so, any government fund allocated to these organizations, can be utilized in establishing new exhibits, rather than spending it on operations and maintenance purposes. This, in due course of time, will attract more visitors, and thus more profit. The Metropolitan museum of the New York city is a perfect example of this type of system. However, the entry tickets should not be too expensive as extraordinary pricing will deter public to visit the museum.
In conclusion, although asking for an admission fee, the museums have certain disadvantages, especially in terms of reduced footfall, however, if charged reasonably, it helps in improving the standards and facilities of these establishments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-14 | hieu19101995 | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | utkarshshahi | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | utkarshshahi | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-17 | varindersingh | 56 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the average monthly maximum temperatures for three Australian cities in the year 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The following is a diagram of a mobile phone recycling process.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some believe that more action should be taken to prevent crime while others feel that crime is being tackled effectively now Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 92
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...the museums to sustain themselves, with no or minimal dependence on government fun...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07396449704 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98251413535 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562130177515 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7270797178 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.923076923 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2745380314 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944297890146 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800148961312 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187117853595 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610800600866 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.