Because businesses are evolving quickly these days, smaller players in the market are made to compete directly with multinational establishments. As a result, small industries are finding it difficult in terms of their sustainability and are pushed towards closure of their enterprise. Although due to this prevailing issue unemployment rate and crime is at its peak, governments’ systematic approach towards this problem can resolve in the long run.
One major problem arising from forced closure of small and medium enterprises due to dominant presence of international players is, ever increasing unemployment. People forced out of their employment due to business closure find it difficult get an opportunity immediately. Therefore, until they find a new opportunity, they have to remain unemployed. For instance, after evaluation of unemployment data by HRD ministry, they have confirmed that there had been 10% surge in number of jobless people in one financial year due abrupt business closures. But, if government takes timely corrective measures against this situation, the increasing unemployment rate can be arrested to a certain number. With the help of administrative powers to rejuvenate native small businesses they can be availed with tax rebates and subsidies. These steps will be help indigenous industries to cut on their overhead costs and focus on market directly to retain their position in the market.
Another issue peeking out due to closures of plethora small businesses is unprecedented increase in crime. For example, when we compare crime rates over the period of past 3 years, we can estimate that there had been net increase in offences by 50 percent. Due to closure of business, people lose their jobs and when people run out of their savings, they think of committing crimes to support their family. Nevertheless, if government starts a scheme for unemployed people who can receive pension until they find their next work opportunity will stop looking forward with committing crimes.
In conclusion, closure of small business due to direct fight with big international players is unforeseen. However, tables can be turned around for job less people by getting them looped in various government schemes
- Some people believe that children should not be given homework every day, while others believe that they must get homework every day in order to be successful at school. 84
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 89
- An increasing number of students choose to go to another country for their education. Do you think the benefits outweigh the problems associated with it ? 78
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples. 67
- Some people think that school should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...er, tables can be turned around for job less people by getting them looped in variou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44985673352 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03201960967 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578796561605 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5659507254 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223744427981 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782689739235 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524550942358 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145433027218 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564335009376 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.